The Change Management Theory Business Essay

The revision Management Theory Business EssayOur accredited era is experiencing massive global and environmental channels than ever before. Observing merely the technological developments, it locomotes drop off that the most powerful interpolates hold happened over the wizard-time(prenominal) fifty years. Managements practice and guess is that todays business environment is especially challenging for large companies because of the rapid pace at which technologies, business processes and markets atomic number 18 evolving. a focusing transplants, such as globalization, workforce, economic shocks, competition, and world politics be or so of the vast external environmental forces that trigger convince upon presidential terms. These forces atomic number 18 un check intolable and unforeseeable and in that locationfore it is vital that an organization has the capabilities to adapt to whatever environment departs might happen. As opposed to external depart forces, inte rnal transposes forces deceit at heart the organization. Elements such as declining efficiency, the raise of employee expectations in tact with jolty demands of the work environment are all internal forces that trigger a require for organisational limiting. more or less theories1 nominate that by planning conservatively you peck manage internal limiting easily by nameing the privation for change, while others argue that change is not something that happens in isolated insidences, frankincense not something you washstand plan2or control.The changing business environment affects the organizations ability for survival, as their survival tactics are being challenged. Organizations constantly have to reeducate themselves retention e really train or department in the organization equally re- avered. Consequently, more and more organizations direct their aid towards the potential benefits of a unified merger and achievement (MA). MAs are often pursued in pasture to ac quire a larger share of an exist market, enter crude markets, eliminate competitors, acquire expertise or assets, transfer skills, save costs, subjoin efficiencies or capitalise on synergies.Unfortunately, most organizational change efforts are scummyly conceived and implemented, a fact that causes most change efforts in organizations to fail3. through with(predicate) the last century, companies paid more attention to strategy, economics and finance. However, today some researches4 argue that a major cause of the high rate of change failures is the fact that managers do not realize that if they do not change their refining to support the changes they are do in strategy, grammatical construction, and technology. If not, the desired changes go a charge fail and shift back into a fit with the original polish5.Furthermore, MA can change the heathenish aspect of an organization due to sorely working environment. In this view, Hitt et al. (2001) argue that acquisitions or me rgers can arrive at inimical working atmosphere some times due to significant differences among twain cultures of the merging firms, which can unclutter working process difficult. However, thisprocess can be quit challanging as Schein6 ague heathenish assessment is usually not possible because the negotiations leading up to the merger/aqcusition have to be unploughed secret. Thus, the merging parties do not discover principal(prenominal) differences until they face themMA is a strategic choice various companies encompases to enter rnew market opportunities and possiblity to amplification revenue beyond geographical boundaries. However, new opprtunities have excessively liberal new challanges to the organizations. When a company changes, either by changing its em sidement or grothws this effects its internal and external environment. Researchers agree the censorious immenseness of managing the human perspectives of the process in order to accomplish the MA goals and to fall upon the needed consolidation. That is why this paper has chosen to focus on the cultural and muckle aspect of change mangement process inside MA commute Management speculationChange focusing literature is diametricaliated between two dominant perspectives with regard to implementing advantageful change in organization. whizz meaning refers to the systematic and think view and the other the chaotic emerging view of organizational change.Carl Weick prominent scholer within change management breaks with the traditionalistic wiev of organizational change and argues that orgnazationas should implement a process of chnage management. That is continous emergent change, when contrasted to the planned view, can be defined as the realization ofa new type of organizing in the absence of explicit a priori intentions7in this view changing is a continuous activity at local levels where people act and make sense of their own social reality8. Continuous changing is a collaborat ive burn up to change management where employees at the operational level as well as mangers are involved in decesion making processes. It brings a holistic view to the organization focuses on interweaving activities, interrelations, and sensemaking.Change is viwe as a continuous activity internally within the organization where people interact and make sense of their own social reality (Weick, 2000, 2001). quite a little make sense oftheir social reality by sensemaking activities, narratives, practices, and multiple realities may be voiced and contrisolelye to down(p) modest changes. These small small-scale changes can be decisive if they occur at the edge of crazy house or in a context of rebalancing and unfreezing. Small changes can have large consequences because of self-reinforcing feedback loops and relations in a social network. In matching systems small changes emerges through the diversity and interconnectedness of galore(postnominal) another(prenominal) micro-conv ersations (Ford Ford, 1995). Micro-level changes provide a platform and a context for transformational change on a macro-level.as in Kotters octonary phases or stages a company must successfully complete in order to obtain lasting change (1995) 9and Lewins Freeze change model(1943)10. Thus, the aim is to implement new methods and systems. This also implies that these changes lie within the organizations control although change-triggering events might have come from immaterial the organization.According to Kotter successful change management is achieved when management carefully plans the change go-ahead. His theory is based upon the 8 mensuration model which has a very systematic view upon organizations and its environment. The 8 step model is give upon eight actions create a sense of urgency, recruit powerful change leaders, build a vision and legally communicate it, remove obstacles, create debauched wins, and build on your momentum. If you do these things, you can help m ake the change part of your organizational culture11. Follwing the perspective of Lewin, the change process must occupy three central steps un-freezing, change and freezing12 . Within un-freezing, inner resistor to change delimits the ability of the individual to move from the present to the desired state. locomote seek to take into account all the forces at work and identify and evalutae, on a trial and error bassis, all the available options13 .The refreezing step establishes ways to make the new level of behavior relatively untroubled against change (Lewin, 1947, p. 344). This step could include installing a new wages system to reinforce the new, desired behavior or restructuring certain aspects of the organization.An supererogatory meaning refers to the complexity view s as in Ralp Stacy (2003)14 of organizational change management. His theory is build upon the view of James Gleick. Gleicks theory is based on Chaos theory and complexity theory. Later on, Stacey march on d eveloped this theory and applied it to human action, as chaos theory originally intended for mathematical deterministic behavior. Chaos theorys get a line message is that our intentional interacting with each other produces intrinsically unorthodox outcomes in the long term, then our planning efforts cannot lead to outcomes we intended something else pass on happen15. However, Stacey does not imply that then everything is utter chaos. As he states predictably unpredictable, thus a system producing patterns that are recognizable and paradoxical. interlocking responsive Processes (CPR) can give insight for top management on how to become more emergent and respond without knowing long term consequences. However, from a bottom line result, business profit maximizing perspective, this might be hard for managers to switch to instantly. It might cost millions. The strategic problem lays within top management being blind to internal need for change. The existing external commercial stra tegy is distant even unknown to the employees and there is no existing internal strategy statement. This causes the employees to think of their job as unrivaled project at a time, missing focus on the development of the company as a whole. This could lead to employees working without a target or a vision unitedly with the company. CPR approach acknowledges the fact that employees are not machines and if the original strategy doesnt produce what it intended. Thus, introducing a case an acquisition between IBM and DMdata in 2004 where IBM management got surprised by the outcome of employee dissatisfaction and its complexities.This paper adresses IBMs acquisition of DM Data as the key reference in this synopsis. The case study, is used in relation to the acquisition are build upon the experiences the former of this paper had working as a trainee in DMdata some(prenominal) before and after the acquisition. This particular acqusition opened the authors eyeball towards the challanges organizations face when implementing new initiatives follwing a merger or acqusition. Why the author find it oparticularly releveant for this course.Introduction of Case studyFirst, I will make a brief introduction of the two companies to get a make better understanding of the organizations and why these may have led to some challenges for both companies. Secondlymost relevant reasons that leadinteresting to observe the case from the corporate culture point of view, which means concerningthe essence of affection businesses, these are essentially different enforcing different values andpriorities concerning job and goals, reflecting with these important inputs potentially conflictive inthe integration process. The conditions mentioned present it as a very appropriate and meaningful woof to develop a case study research.IBM was founded in 1742 and was effected in the USA. It is one of the worlds leading companies in IT. historical heritage is very important for the company, in ter m of know-how but also, in term of marketing IBM has slightly 340.000 employees worldwide and is represented in more than 160 countries16. Given IBMs surface and origin it brings certain values and norms to the business which is grounded in its culture and identity.On the contrary DM data was one of the biggest software companies in Scandinavia. It was established by two Danish companies Danske Bank and Maersk Data. The company encompassed 800 employees located in Aarhus and Copenhagen. Even though the company only existed for seven years it managed to create outstanding profits per year.17 The acquisition between IBM and DM data took place in 2004. After the acquisition, 13% of the employees resigned from their job per year.Many employees mentioned the matrix structure and the American way of doing things as the reason for resigning. 18 The differences of the organizational culture and the way we do thing in each company were fundamentally different. When you effort to change th e core of a companys values and norms its bound to create many challenges19.Both companies, are facing changes in their organizational structures through a MA. That is,the processes, politics, values and frame of references. Each participant of this processes either the acquiring IBM or the acquired DMdata have to face different process and challenges. Clearly, both companies get touch on part of their identity and way of doing things. However due to limited rag to the IBM employees this paper focuses on the view of Dmdata employees.Analysis of IBM change management initiativeIBM managements intended strategy was to incorporate Dmdata as a datterselskab to the master(prenominal) organization of IBM, althoughthey succesed to acquire Dmdata the acqusition broth various unintended changes with it. As mentioned earlier critically positioned employees left the organization and a hostile and confusing environment arised. The unsuccesfull change management of the new initiatives within Dmdata, resulted in inefficient resource utilization, poor products and services20, and frusttration amon employees and management.IBM management approach to the acqusition can be characterized as a controlling. That is,Some of the DMdata employees reactions came from poor communications such as IBM CEO Lars Mikkelgaard used the banter fusion when he visited us for the first time, when it was in fact a takeover21. Other reactions were licking about changing from national to an international company, from gradable to matrix structure and from small to big company.He empha size of its the success they had in DM data on some(prenominal) occasions by expression Those who sit down and think about it, then DM-data was a success story. Built from 53 men to something IBM would buy for x billions later22. He feels lose by IBMs management style and does not consider it as fitted for Danish culture In Denmark, IBM is derived by this American team spirit. The DM-data culture is influenc ed by the culture of Maersk and Danske Bank, which is very Danish23. And I have also been public lecture about quality in life etc. But when you are bought up, you come into an identity crisis.Furthermore, Dmdata employees lacked an incentive to adapt to the changes as they felt they new best as one employee states He stereotypes the Americans There are several States in the US where American Indians are not allowed to walk together more than four at a time. If they do, then you are allowed to spud them.24And he goes on elaborating his indignation of doing things the America way are not allowed to have loaded weapon, so we can laugh a good turn of it25 here he shows that he does not take IBM seriously. The HR coach-and-four talks a lot about how successful the company was, but ridicules of IBM to almost having gone bankrupt. IBM has also been close to going under in 1993. There it was close enough to not exist anymore. And here it is clear that one as a giant company with the am bitions one had, establishes control preparations. These are then some of the procedure which we have to comply to26.Follwing Lewin effective change could not tkae place unless there was a felt need be all those concerned27. Also in this view, Kotter agues for establishing a sense of urgency. That is people need a good reasontodothingsdifferently, faling this might have created the anxiety and unsecurity Dmdata employees felt. The plump for step of Kotters 8step model might have easen, having an aly . Short term winsNadler and Tushman 1995 suggest that there are mainly two types of change that organisations are go about with, namely first- order and second- order changes28. . First -Order changes are characterized by small adjustments in system, processes or structures, whereas Second order changes are characterized by transformational which affects the core identity and values of an organization. Nadler and Tushman refer to transformational change as discontinuous change. They win dissects the changes as follows incremental (tuning and accommodation). Tuning as being anticipatory and adaptation as being reactive. Discontinuous (re-orientation and digression) change. Re-orientation as being anticipatory and recreation as being reactive.Acquisitions such as IBM/ DMdata are generally regarded as a second- order change. Although IBM and DMdata are in the same industry the size of the two companies together with the cultural heritance of the two are dissimilar. There are national cultural differences, structural differences together with strategic differences which may caused frustration among the employees at DMdata. Furthermore, it is important to into consideration when characterizing whethera change is transfomational or transactional this can be viwed from two sides in mergers and aqcusiotions.remember althought the acqusition can be carachterized as frame divagation for DMdataFollowing Palmer, Dunford and Akin29 any organizational change usually invol ves paying attention to organizational culture. That it for IBM management to provide a new vision for the DMdata employees and not simply imposing their own without any involvement from the DMdata employees.The diagnostical tools can be helpful for an organisation to know which changes it is dealing with so that it can inform its strategy selection and organisational configuration to better respond to such changes. It seems homogeneous IBM management underestimated some of the challenges it was presented to when they acquired DMdata. The strategic problem lays within top management being blind to internal need for change and adoption within DMdata. Adapting the right diagnostical tools could have helped the management to take the right action in the right context. The lack of information could have been prevented by management fetching a nurturer approach. Instead of the top down directors approach.DiscussionChange and how people react to it are important features of organisation al life. Its vital to remember in times of change, especially transformational change such as mergers and acqusitions, employees are not machines. The way we perceive change and its consecuenses can be different and paradox. As discussed earlier, it can be helpful for management to characterize the scale and scope of the change to better comprehend the impact of a change. However, its important to keep in mind that you will always be confronted with unintended change outcomes. The main problem areas within change implementation in mergers and aquisitions lie within differences in culture, not having a clear communication, and not assigning anyone asresponsible for the change initiatives. The external, managerial and operational level never worked together as one in the IBM/DMdata case study. When merging or acquiring two companies it is critical to consider their corporate culture. The success of a merger/aqusition depends as lots on culture fit as it does on strategic and financial .Various failed deals can be attributed to corporate culture differences never being considered, or cultural clashes never being addressed. Furthermore, if the people side of MAs are ignored, as in the case study, both companies face not meeting the anticipated break up of the transaction.1 Kotter, Lewin2 Choas theries Ralp stacey, Car Weick3 Strategic change management class notes, lecture one4 Gerry Johnson , the cultural web, Mary Jo Hatch Majen Shultz, identity, Edgar Schein5 Palmer, Ian, Richard Dunford, and one thousand Akin. (2009) Managing organizational Change p. 1636 Schein, E.H. 1990. Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco Jossey-Bass p.1787 Orlowski 1996, p 65 accesed in Weick 2000 p 2278 Weick, 2000 p. 2259 Kotter 1995, Leading Change Why Transformation Efforts Fail10 Palmer, Ian, Richard Dunford, and Gib Akin. (2009) Managing Organizational Change p. 1951112 Palmer, Ian, Richard Dunford, and Gib Akin. (2009) Managing Organizational Change p. 19513 Lew in 1947a accesed through study notes from lecture 214 Stacey, Ralph. (2003) Organizations as Complex Responsive Processes of Relating. Journal ofInnovative Management15 Stacey, Ralph. (2003) Organizations as Complex Responsive Processes of Relating. Journal ofInnovative Management p2816 IBM Database17 DM Data handbook p 1618 www.computerworld.com http//www.computerworld.dk/art/40353?cid=4q=dm+datasm=searcha=cidi=4o=5pos=619 Strategic change management class notes20 As a reslut of many employees leaving many projects didnt get finished with led to many dissatisfied clientsandcostumers.21 Malike Karatepe22 Comment 1, concomitant 123 Comment 2, Appendix 124 Comment 6, Appendix 125 Comment 7, Appendix 126 Comment 8, Appendix 127 course notes lektion 2 by Rex Degnegaard28 Palmer,Dunford and akin p 8729 Palmer, Dunford and Akin p. 9